No, I'm sorry. That's a common phallusy.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 16/11/2009, at 7:21 AM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> No, no Andrew, you are quite incorrect. This lens is exotic,
> expensive
> and an object of lust. It is clearly female. Though I value
> your opinions on matters photographic and defer to your expertise on
> matters philosophic, sex assignment is
> squarely in my area of expertise.
>
> A Fellow of the American College of Endocrinology, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|