Well, not many questions, just one - I just wanted to see what the
members owning one has been up to with it, .i.e. to see some sample
images :-) But Fernando, you should know that this list goes through
different micro-phases all the time. I have seen the 350/2.8 being
discussed a lot in the past also, by looking at the list archives.
Also, the 250/2.0 has the ultra-coolness-factor, since it's optically
the best Zuiko ever made, and it's an f/2, and there were apparently
very, very few made. Of the 350/2.8, there were only "few made" :-)
Kind of an "ultimate" lens, and just that little bit more special/
exotic to most people, since there is in today's modern lens lineups
absolutely no equivalent, even though there are plenty 300/2.8 and
400/2.8 lenses.
But really, I was just wanting to see some samples, have still only
seen a small handful. And no Black+White film samples :-(
> Because David Loubser started raising lots of questions about the
> 250/2
> about 10 days ago. No one ventured the same level of interest in the
> 350/2.8. I didn't even know there was such a lens.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
>> Why does the list comment so much related to the 250/2, and not so
>> much on the 350/2.8?
>>
>> Just curious ...
>>
>> Fernando.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|