Oh, well, I thought he was asking just because that one John had for
sale was quickly sold. I seem to remember beautiful pictures of it.
But there are two 350/2.8 at Camtech .... too big to send it to
Montevideo, Chuck ;-) - that one would certainly be stopped at
Custom's ... and I already bought John some more portable things. All
this to say that last Monday morning an f=170mm I won in NZ arrived
home :-) - great help from Brian ... had so little time these days
that I didn't even clean its glass.
Only that there are no green frogs 'round here :-) [thinking of Mike
Lazzari's TOPE entry] - and I seem to recall Mike L. did some shots of
baby foxes in the whereabouts with a 350/2.8 ... or did I dream of
that?
If it performs as good as the 250/2 does ... well I'd prefer that one
- just because.
Fernando.
2009/11/10 Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Because David Loubser started raising lots of questions about the 250/2
> about 10 days ago. No one ventured the same level of interest in the
> 350/2.8. I didn't even know there was such a lens.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
>> Why does the list comment so much related to the 250/2, and not so
>> much on the 350/2.8?
>>
>> Just curious ...
>>
>> Fernando.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Dr.Fernando González Gentile
Av.L.P.Ponce 1526B
11600 Montevideo, Uruguay.
Phone: +598 2 7084858
Fax: +598 2 7087396
<fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|