Candace,
I understand. You, as I, just want to get the job done with minimal
fuss. What's simple to me may not be to you and vice versa. I've
used computers since the dark ages of punch cards when a terminal with a
command prompt was a huge advance. So the command line is simple for me.
On the other hand, my eyes glaze over when navigating thru the
complexities of a digicam, so I use OM's :-)
I am also getting a better understanding of what digicam raw conversion
means to many here: raw in and pretty close to "done" out. Command line
tools will do that but would require a lot of experimentation to define
the parameter set needed.
Russ Butler
Candace Lemarr wrote:
> Hi Russ,
>
> You know...when I post to this list I am acutely aware of the fact that
> there is more knowledge and experience here than pretty much any where
> else online. Which is why I love to read everything I can that is
> discussed here, but also why I rarely post. I have great respect for the
> collective experience on this list. But I know that so much of the info
> shared here is very much over my head.
> That said, I have never used a program like that which you are
> recommending, and I would, indeed, be bugging list members for much help
> if I were to try it.
> Is this really a viable option for someone like myself?
> I am fairly intelligent, but simple and basic are my friends.
>
> Mostly, what I want my RAW converter to do, is to get the most out of
> the colors, recover highlights to that program's best ability (if
> necessary), get the white balance where I want it to be, and to batch
> process all of that.
> I am happy to do any and all other edits in Photoshop.
>
> Candace
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|