Even with RAW one can still have some images need no special adjustment
except simple +/- compensation, I consider these are direct outputs, for
example:
http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/OMC/5D2_01/IMG_D002.html
http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/OMC/5D2_01/IMG_D010.html
http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/OMC/5D2_01/IMG_D013.html
But in many cases additional adjustment is required for my taste.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt"
> I'm pretty sure all the Canyon users here shoot raw. I'd be hard
> pressed to tell you what the direct output from Canyon (a JPEG utilizing
> some set of processing parameters) looks like. I couldn't tell you if
> it was good or bad.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Ken Norton wrote:
>>> Thanks for watching, Phx. I'm not a fancy guy but sometimes just can't
>>> stand
>>> the direct output from Canyon :-)
>>>
>>
>>
>> Whenever I've said something like that, the bricks fall down on me.
>>
>> Now I just ignore it altogether. It is obvious that just like MP3 audio
>> files being accepted as "great", the dumbing down of the masses has
>> occurred
>> and the Canyon "look" is accepted as "great".
>>
>> Whatever...
>>
>> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|