Don't feel bad. I have the same 14-42, but wrote "45" (and didn't
type it incorrectly, just made a gaff!).
Whatever the heck it is, it's pretty dang good. On the slow side, of
course, but where I will use them, they rock.
Joel W.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Jim Couch
<zuikoholic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That should have been 14-42. (I cannot type worth a damn, and it is even
> worse on the laptop I was using.
>
> I agree with you on the plastic mounts - but it does make for a light
> lens, we shall see how well they hold up. I plan to pick up a 12-60
> after I sell the rest of my Nik*n gear, and suspect it will be my main
> lens unless I am traveling light.
>
> Jim
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|