That should have been 14-42. (I cannot type worth a damn, and it is even
worse on the laptop I was using.
I agree with you on the plastic mounts - but it does make for a light
lens, we shall see how well they hold up. I plan to pick up a 12-60
after I sell the rest of my Nik*n gear, and suspect it will be my main
lens unless I am traveling light.
Jim
Joel Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Jim Couch
> <zuikoholic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I purchased a 'refurbished' 2 lens kit form
>> B&H. The body, 14-54, and 40-150 came in a box that was just a hair
>> smaller, and considerably lighter than the D200 (which I still had as I
>> had not sold it prior to receiving the 620. this will certainly address
>> my weight complaints!
>>
>
> I hope you enjoy the kit, Jim.
>
> On the kit lenses, is there a "new" 14-54 of which this is an example?
> The 14-54 and 40-150 seem like an unusual combination.
>
> I just bought a used E-410 kit to get the 14-45 and 40-150 lenses in
> particular. I wasn's sure quite what I would do with the body, but
> when I shot with it a bit, it has now found a place in my "light" bag.
>
> I'm still a little appalled at the plastic mounts of the 14-45 and
> 40-150, but they are small and light lenses.
>
> I'm also interested in the 25, so I look forward to your report on that.
>
> Joel W.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|