Subject: | Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10 |
---|---|
From: | Philippe Amard <philippe.amard@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:51:47 +0200 |
Donald wrote: >Philippe Amard wrote: > > >>" an innocent tourist or other sight-seer taking a photograph of a >>police officer is likely to have a reasonable excuse" . >>That's good news! >>Phx O:-) >> >> >> >> > >Yes, but you'll have to prove it... > > > > > Pick up your very best French accent and repeat after me: "Fetchez la Vache ! Hope it works,... Phx >I'm only half joking. > >D. > > > > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Michael Collins |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Charles Geilfuss |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Donald |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Charles Geilfuss |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |