Subject: | Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10 |
---|---|
From: | Philippe Amard <philippe.amard@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:40:07 +0200 |
" an innocent tourist or other sight-seer taking a photograph of a police officer is likely to have a reasonable excuse" . That's good news! Phx O:-) David Bell wrote: >http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page20750 > >Dave > > >___________________________________________________ > >______________ >Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus >Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ >Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ > > > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, David Bell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Donald |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, David Bell |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Donald |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |