On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Chuck Norcutt
<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Point valid and accepted. In particular, my comments reflect my opinion
> of Pop Photo of the mid 1970s or early 1980s when I grew disgusted with
> it and stopped buying it. I'm not sure I've read more than a couple
> issues of Pop Photo since then. However, the few issues that I've read
> from time to time didn't convince me that I'd been missing much.
You're not missing much, but it gives an insight or two into the
commercial/retail side of photography. Interestingly, since they are
not at the cutting edge with reviews, they tend (in those I read, and
I don't read them all) to try to come down on the side of the angels.
The interesting thing (to me) is to see what they think that is.
> If there were ever any youngsters here and if they were silly enough to
> be hanging on my words then they will now know better. :-)
Tut, man! You are a list titan. I said so many years ago, and still
maintain it.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|