Maybe yes,
I can't get warm or cold by (this) leica M. I'm just no rangefinder
person I suppose.
No DoF preview (try focussing @ f1.2?). Close focus practically
nonexistant, what you see is what you guess.
An OM(3Ti) is far more compact than the M9 with, @ your choice:
35f2.8, 40f2, 50f1.8, 28f2, 21f2, 18f3.5,
100f2, and maybe even the 90f2. And when I look at the samples I have
to say the 100f2 beats the
M 90/2 hands down:). Do I have to mention I even like the OM looks
better? The M9 with the straight upper right corner just looks odd.
Couldn't they have made a nice ISO dial over there? And the back is
totally out of proportion.
Iwert
2009/9/9 Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> You gotta hand it to Leica on this one. They have done a smashing job of
> selling the sizzle as well as the steak. That brochure is very well done.
> I love the story line in pictures. Guy gets girl in the end--although one
> could be offended that the girl is introduced with the "Accessories".
>
> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|