Subject: | Re: [OM] ( DZ OM ) Value for money? |
---|---|
From: | Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:13:05 -0300 |
What might have I said :-( !? I tried to mean "At last I could understand you !." HTH Fernando. Chuck Norcutt wrote: > Sorry. I didn't understand "At last I got you !" > > Chuck Norcutt > > Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote: > >> <http://tinyurl.com/5lqd7c> >> <http://tinyurl.com/n543kq> >> >> Amazing. Your conclusions, I mean. At last I got you ! >> >> :-) >> >> Fernando. >> >> Chuck Norcutt wrote: >> >>> What got me on this point to begin with was DPreview's test of the Canon >>> 70-200/2.8L which is one of the more revered zooms in Canon's stable. >>> Check this page which is the test of that lens on a 5D body. >>> <http://www.lenstip.com/115.1-article-Polarizing_filters_test.html> >>> Use the aperture slider and watch the resolution graph change. >>> >> >> -- Dr. Fernando González Gentile M.D. Av.L.P.Ponce 1526B - 11600 Montevideo, Uruguay. Phone: +598 2 7084858 Fax: +598 2 7087396 <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] ( DZ OM ) Value for money?, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] ( DZ OM ) Value for money?, Joel Wilcox |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( DZ OM ) Value for money?, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( DZ OM ) Value for money?, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |