Hi John, Chuck and all,
> From: John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There are 5 types of 50 1.8
>
> 1 - Silver nosed, single coated
> 2 - black filter ring, single coated, glass parts different than type 1.
> 3 & 4 multicoated. "Japan" on name ring. Mostly identical inside
> except type 4 has different lens group 2nd in from the rear. Name ring
> will say "MC" (type 3) or not (Type 4).
> 5 - Multicoated, "Made in Japan" on name ring, shares no optical parts
> with type 3 or 4. Uses same name ring as type 4, Not marked MC.
>
Thanks for the reminder. I wasn't aware of the type-4! So, the only external
difference with the type (the 'miJ') is that type 4 is marked 'Japan' and
type 5 'made in Japan' at the name ring, am I wrong?
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> >> No, it's not the MIJ although they comment that it's multicoated so
> > it's
> >> later rather than earlier. The MIJ name ring just says "ZUIKO" and
> > not
> >> "F.ZUIKO". Also, on the MIJ, the focal length precedes the aperture
> >> whereas this older lens lists the aperture first.
>
<snip>
> >>> http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1279/cat/14
>
Thanks for your accurate and comprehensive description of Zuiko's
different markings. But now I'm wondering if the lens shown in the
above link is the _actual_ lens they used for the test, or just a
generic picture? Anyway, as you already said, the presence or not of
multicoating should have no effect at all on Chromatic Aberration.
Cheers,
--
Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas
IES Turaniana (Roquetas de Mar, Almeria)
<http://cjss.sytes.net/>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|