Subject: | Re: [OM] Z. 50 1.8 on EP-1--- review |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:25:41 -0500 |
> > Even we don't seem to be able to say for sure. As you may recall some > early OM lenses are multicoated but not every element is multicoated and > only some lenses advertise that they're multicoated. Yeah, it's a lot like my 100/2.8. It has different coatings than earlier 100/2.8s, but doesn't have the green reflection of the "MC" variety. It's a strange bird. A lot like its owner. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Z. 50 1.8 on EP-1--- review, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Using FL-50R, wedding sample pictures, Eneloop batts, etc..., Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Z. 50 1.8 on EP-1--- review, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Z. 50 1.8 on EP-1--- review, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |