Subject: | Re: [OM] E-620 review |
---|---|
From: | "Sue Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:10:06 -0500 |
Out here? Not really. Bill Pearce ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 9:52 AM Subject: Re: [OM] E-620 review > Doesn't matter. Both are "equally" far from a practical standpoint. > > Chuck Norcutt > > Sue Pearce wrote: >> . Unfortunately, there's >>> probably no place within 100 miles where I could see either one of them. >>> >> Chuck , >> >> Count yourself lucky. There's probably no place within a thousand where I >> can see either. >> >> Bill Pearce >> > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.7/2222 - Release Date: 07/07/09 05:53:00 -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] E-620 review, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Using FL-50R, wedding sample pictures, Eneloop batts, etc..., Jim Nichols |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-620 review, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-620 review, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |