I agree Ken, I also see the flaws in this image, but it is precisely
because I am taking it into the
context of the massive size of the image, together with typical print-
out sizes, that I am much
happier with this image.
Flawed as it is, it is still an infinitely superior sample of E-P1
output than the terrible
DPReview f/6.3 / ISO200 image.
On 26 Jun 2009, at 3:42 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> There is gobs of CA in that picture and a general lack of edge-
> contrast. But
> for crying out loud, consider the pixel-count. When printed, the CA
> and
> edge-contrast is a non-issue. Over that size, I can easily fix the
> CA and a
> touch of sharpening takes care of the other.
>
> The hazards of pixel-peeping is that we lose perspective. We lose the
> perspective of just how big these files are.
>
> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|