Subject: | Re: [OM] Image Storage on the Road |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:35:14 -0400 |
Why is it necessary to have a USB interface in order to recognize a hardware interrupt? In fact, if it doesn't recognize a hardware interrupt you are at risk of problems if you change cards and write to the card since the computer will probably be using the cached directory of the first card inserted. That leads to much ugliness which occurred in the early days of PCs with diskettes but has long since been solved. Are you also required to rescan when cards have been changed? I don't think so. If a rescan is required I would consider the hardware and/or software to be defective. Chuck Norcutt Mike Lazzari wrote: >> Not the case with my Dell. Cards can be inserted and removed at will. > An argument that they could be accessing the usb interface. If it were > another bus I believe you would need to force a rescan for it to be > recognized as The Moose suggests. > > For the amount of photos I take in a day the usb cord directly from the > camera works just fine. Don't really need to carry around any more > gadgets and gizmos. 8gb uploads in a reasonable amount of time. > > Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] reasonably priced 3Ti 270400363196 you know where, Charles Geilfuss |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Image Storage on the Road, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Image Storage on the Road, Paul Laughlin |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Image Storage on the Road, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |