I've heard that but have no experience. But it makes sense to me in
that rear elements are always substantially smaller than the front. An
equal amount of damage there covers a larger percentage of the glass.
It may be there are other considerations also but I don't know what they
might be.
Chuck Norcutt
Dawid Loubser wrote:
>
>
> Damage to the rear element is much more pronounced though, is it not?
> I've never
> personally used a lens with rear element damage, so I have no idea.
>
>
> On 05 Jun 2009, at 3:43 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> Keep in mind that a chip or other large defect on the front element
>> can't transmit any image badness as long as it's blacked-in.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|