Ken Norton wrote:
> Throughout the history of photography, nearly all of the most important and
> compelling photographs were technically flawed in anything from minor to near
> catastrophic ways.
>
Would more than a tiny few be made any worse by having fewer technical
flaws?
Would someone who didn't study, practice and work at doing the best work
possible with the tools at hand have even managed the flawed imagesones
they did make?
Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|