>
> You've caught me out, in a sense. I know what the original is, and it
> doesn't work sideways. :-) Even though I've made it abstract, that
> knowledge biases me. Here's the original, an image of the "flowing"
> stone hair of a statue.
> <
> http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Miscellaneous&image=_MG_6431ia.jpg
> >
>
>
I thought it looked like hair. And that's one reason it influenced me to
angle the shot.
Another reason why I was so aggressive in cropping was the horrid vignetting
in the lower corners of the image. That's why I went square in the first
place, but then thought about eye-flow.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
