| Subject: | Re: [OM] (OT & OT) Panorama problem |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 May 2009 10:17:07 -0500 |
> > At least in PCB design, I think tracks (?) should be routed with 45 degree > corners. > I think this depends on the frequency of the signal passing through the trace. When you need to maintain "wave-guide" characteristics, the corner does get angled. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Olympus Pen Article on Zone-10, Ken Norton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 20/05/2009: boring lens tests ;-), Jan Steinman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OT & OT) Panorama problem, Carlos J. Santisteban |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OT & OT) Panorama problem, Jan Steinman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |