Thanks for that, Chris. Fine review. Hard camera to resist (but I
will try to make the E-3 suffice).
Joel W.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Iwert
>
> If you look at John Foster's review <http://bit.ly/7SjkS> you will see
> that he remarks on the viewfinder. It is a little larger than the
> E-520's, as well as having the information along the bottom (which I
> prefer).
>
> Chris
>
>
> On 27 Apr 2009, at 06:28, Iwert wrote:
>
>> replace top screen with lack of a decent viewfinder, but info in
>> bottom part is at least a step forward.
>>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|