| Subject: | Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape |
|---|---|
| From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:55:31 +1100 |
> > > Where the 90/2 shines is that it is excellent at nearly all > focal-lengths. > > It's different to the Tamron 90mm then, it only seems to work at 90mm ! ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Ritz going under, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] pizza, was New Bessa Pics, Nicoletta Da Ros |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape, Michael Collins |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape, C.H.Ling |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |