| Subject: | Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:52:18 -0800 |
Jan Steinman wrote: > My general philosophy is get something better than you need, as entropy is on > the side of it becoming merely adequate at some time in the future. Life is > too short for soft lenses! > I guess we won't be seeing your entries in the Krappy Kamera contests. :-) Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape, Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] pizza, was New Bessa Pics, Michael Collins |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape, Jan Steinman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape, Michael Collins |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |