Subject: | Re: [OM] E-30 |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:26:39 +1100 |
> Chuck Norcutt <> wrote: > > No need to set resolution when setting pixel dimensions. Resolution is > a meaningless number unless accompanied by physical dimensions and, in > that case, the two control the pixel dimensions. Without specification > of physical dimensions the resolution value is only "advisory" and plays > > no part in any actual display of the image. > interesting that if you have a screen with 72 ppi and you display your 800 pixel wide image at that resolution it will be 11.11111111111111111111111 inches wide on the screen ! ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Updates on my photo gallery, ws |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] E-30, Jim Nichols |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-30, Wayne Harridge |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-30, Jim Nichols |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |