Hi Ian
I've just tried to do that, but Aperture will not see the .jpg "copy",
even with the Duplicates box unticked. I'll work it out when I have
more time tomorrow.
But I should expect the .jpg to look sharper since it has been
processed. I am going to do what I want to the RAW file to make it
look good, rather than accepting what the camera provides. I'm not
sure that looking at the .jpg example will show me whether Studio or
Viewer would do a better job of interpreting the RAW file as a result.
Chris
On 10 Feb 2009, at 21:13, SwissPace wrote:
> Chris if you want to see it, shoot raw and jpg in the camera and
> import
> both in seperate folders into aperture, then compare them side by side
> on same monitor. you don't need to use the loupe, the jpgs are much
> sharper and vivid than the raw files processed by aperture, even I can
> see it and I normally don't see faults in images as well as most
> members of this group, though I did used to be able to hear the
> difference between crap and good HIFI cable interconnects ;-)
>> results you have to use them; but since I am incapable of spotting
>> the
>> difference, Aperture (and LightZone and Picasa, along with iView and
>> PS) do the trick for me.
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|