>
> I'm going to work with Studio 2 for a while. It has pretty much the
> same old stodgy workflow of Viewer and Studio 1.
I keep hearing people dis' the workflow of the Olympus software, but
honestly, I don't see it the same way. What is really nice about Lightroom
is the fact that it dynamically updates the thumbnails. But Viewer/Studio is
exceptionally fast for finding your selects. For shooting events where I
might have 300-3000 pictures to go through, I find Viewer to be an
exceptional tool and until I reach the point where I'm actually needing to
fine-tune things, it's MUCH faster than Lightroom.
Another program which is starting to get legs is Raw Therapee. For finding
your selects, it is horribly slow, and I prefer Viewer for that, but once
you have your selects or if you are just working a handful of images to
begin with it offers all the same functionality (except healing brush) that
Lightroom has.
I was giving Studio2 a tryout and as good as it is, I found it not to really
offer my anything that I'm not currently getting. Oh, and it was horribly
unstable on my computer.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|