Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1

Subject: Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 07:27:26 -0500
But your OM5D II has small pixels too.  For diffraction limited shooting 
you'll be limited to about f/9-10.

Chuck Norcutt

C.H.Ling wrote:
> Thanks for Wayne and Chuck's confirmation, then we may only be able to shoot 
> at F4 with the 7-14 at 7mm :-) I would prefer to use my 16mm fisheye with 
> OM5D II.
> 
> C.H.Ling
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Wayne Harridge"
> 
>>> C.H.Ling <> wrote:
>>>
>>> Isn't it the diffraction limit is also related to the lens focal length?
>>> As
>>> I remember the shorter the lens the faster it reach the diffraction
>>> limit.
>>> If you have a long lens, you can stop down more before it reach the
>>> diffraction limit.
>>>
>> Simplistically, the amount of diffraction is related to the "size of the 
>> hole" through which the light passes, so yes a longer lens can be stopped 
>> down further than a short lens before it has a diffraction "problem".  A 
>> 200mm lens at f16 has an effective aperture of 12.5mm, same as a 50mm lens 
>> at f4.
>>
>> ...Wayne
> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz