Subject: | Re: [OM] MR trip to Antarctica |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 08 Feb 2009 07:28:34 -0500 |
Sounds more like design deficiencies than QA problems. Chuck Norcutt usher99@xxxxxxx wrote: > Remember the previous Antarctica trip? > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/aa-07-worked.shtml > > Here's how the current batch fared. > > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/antarctica-2009-worked.shtml > > > A bit disappointing for the new digital back for OM's. Wonder if QA is > suffering in a rush to get out a selling profitable product in a > bad economy. > > Mike > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1, Richard Lovison |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] MR trip to Antarctica, Marc Lawrence |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] MR trip to Antarctica, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |