Wow! Ph.Ds they must be right! Optics engineers, we photographer must leart
from them!
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: <usher99@xxxxxxx>
> Nah,
> They are mostly optics Ph.D.'s. The coding of the DXO is a work in
> progress with a somewhat difficult interface and some bugs.
>
> Seems weird that the ISO standard 12232 in one standard relates to the
> "exposure necessary to saturate the camera." Not what one would have
> thought would be a good way to standardize.
>
> http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Technologies/Measurement-definitions
>
>
>
> Here is the DXOMARK data on the G1 vs E-520:
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/cazlv8
>
> Remember the review and Mooses's comments. Clearly this nice objective
> sensor data doesn't tell the whole story.
> I suppose sort of like buying an amp with THD < 1X10**-32 % without
> listening to it.
>
> Mike
>
>
> CH says:
>
> It is very clear that they are not photographers, just a group of
> software
> engineers.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|