Interesting, I can't find any chroma on the first shot but on the bird shot,
I see a little purple fringe on the left side especially the top left petal.
For the aperture, I can't remember very well but most likely both are at
F5.6.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt"
> You couldn't ask for better detail in the bird. I can clearly see the
> chroma in the first image but it's much less prominent in the second.
> What's the difference? Aperture?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> C.H.Ling wrote:
>> Ok, even I had some complain on the CA, the 300/4.5 is still an
>> indispensable lens for me, I support about Ken's opinion, here are two
>> shots
>> taken with the lens early last year on an OM-40D body at F5.6.
>>
>> This one shows the bokeh:
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_1009.jpg
>>
>> This one shows the details resolved:
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_1017.jpg
>>
>> Of course I expect it will work even better on a FF OM-5D II body :-)
>>
>> C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
