>
> OK, the masses have spoken. I realized that my eyes were not
> in a calibrated state when doing this conversion. The room I
> was in had some nasty glare from the ceiling lights and
> windows. Sorry about the excuses, but I recognize that my
> eyes were not in a proper state of observation. Just maybe
> it's a little better now. If not, screw it.
>
The tonalities in this version are *much* better, more highlight detail (I
thought they may have been lost in the original exposure) and the shadow
areas look more natural.
What was done differently in coming up with this version ?
...Wayne
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|