I don't see any trouble in the trees. The only thing I see is what
appears to be some blocky JPEG artifacts in the clouds. I don't know
what caused it and it shouldn't be there but I don't think it would be
visible in an 11x14 or smaller print.
While a 10MP 4/3 sensor can probably beat Velvia area for area it's a
bit unfair to compare 2.25 square cm of sensor to 102 square cm of
Velvia on a 6x17 camera. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
ws wrote:
> First of all, rarely do people post full res images, but I think that is
> the only way to really asses an image. Thanks for doing that.
>
> I'm curious how the following picture was taken, and is this a composite?
>
> When looking close, the tree detail has a lot of bad artifacts. Not sure
> if this is from jpeg compression or post processing, or simply the camera
> and lens? The effect reminds me of what happens with high ISO
> and noise reduction from the camera.
>
> I don't mean to be critical, the image is very nice, but the detail has
> a lot to be desired when you look closer.
>
> Granted, I'm just back from visiting a Peter Lik gallery, and my
> senses are over whelmed by the detail his huge prints exude.
>
> Wayne
>
> At 02:12 PM 1/12/2009, you wrote:
>> This one, from a different season, will give you a good idea of the
>> three stage process:
>> http://home.tiscali.nl/vanlindert/P2280004_with_c.jpg
>>
>> Frank.
>
>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
