Lightroom suits my various needs for image management and adjustment very
well indeed, but if you have an alternative method for managing your image
library, you may not find that aspect as overwhelmingly useful as I did.
And, Donald, I don't imagine that you need to tell Putin's man in wherever
anything about watching your use of anything. Believe me when I say he
knows already :-)
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: Donald [mailto:d1956m198d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 13 December 2008 14:18
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Lightroom?
nsurit@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Has anyone been using Lightroom 2.0?? If so, what has that experience
> been ?? Bill Barber
Ditto what Nathan said. It runs just fine on my Gateway Sempron refurb
laptop, and even better on the desktop. Does everything except the heavy
stuff, but nipping out and in to/from Photoshop is easy and seamless,
especially so with version 2.1, integration is probably better with the
latest versions (I have CS2).
There are probably a few things you could still ask for in terms of output,
but for management, RAW conversion and print/web output I'm delighted.
As I was saying only a couple of months ago to 'Putin's man in Jemimaville',
it's as if someone had been watching my use of digital imaging over my
shoulder and written a program to help. Love it.
D.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|