Thanks, CH
Chuck Norcutt
C.H.Ling wrote:
> Ektar 100 has lower color saturation, finer grain, narrow exposure latitude
> compared with normal Gold film, avoid under expose it. With Vuescan, the
> Gold 100/200 and Fuji HG200 seems have more linear color compared with Ektar
> 100.
>
> Below is the setting I used to scan all negatives recently, with this
> setting, most of the Gold 100/200 and Fuji HG200 images only require simple
> level and curve but Ektar 100 require more on individual channel adjustment.
>
> Color bal: None
> Curve low/high: 0.5
> Brightness: 2.5
> R/G/B: 1
> Negative vendor: Generic (do not specify film type, it causes more trouble)
> Scanner color space: Built-in
> Output color space: sRGB
> Scanner: Nikon 4000ED
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <usher99@xxxxxxx>
>
>> It appears that CH has tried it. Would be great if he commented on any
>> impressions.
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd been thinking about trying the new Ektar 100
>> since it is supposed to scan well.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>> --
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.17/1844 - Release Date: 12/11/2008
> 8:58 PM
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|