I've got five 50mm lenses (two 1.4s, two 1.8s and a 3.5 macro) but, as
Khen says, I think 28 and 35 have to be judged pretty common as well.
Zuiko 85, 90 and 100mm are probably relatively on the rare side but the
135/3.5 is probably fairly common as I'm sure it was considerably
cheaper than its shorter telephoto brethren.
Chuck Norcutt
Wayne Harridge wrote:
>
>
>
>> khen lim <castanet.xiosnetworks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> LOL....actually you're right!If we were to go all the way to define
>> minimalism, then stick with certain fixed focal lengths such as 28mm,
>> 35mm
>> and 50mm. But if we do, a lot of people won't be participating - well,
>> that's my guess. Some amongst us are so smitten with the 90mm f2 - and
>> for
>> good reason of course - and they're not likely to warm to this idea.
>>
>
> How about a quick survey ? Is there anyone on this list with an OM body that
> doesn't have a 50mm lens to fit it ?
>
> ...Wayne
>
> Wayne Harridge
>
> http://lrh.structuregraphs.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.16/1841 - Release Date: 12/10/2008
> 9:30 AM
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|