Based on the way this was started and presented (OM-1 with 50/1.4 or
90/2) it was my opinion that we were talking about minimalist equipment.
But I don't judge the 90/2 to be minimalist equipment either.
Chuck Norcutt
Wayne Harridge wrote:
>
>
>
>> Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> 24-300 doesn't strike me as "minimalist" :-)
>>
>
> So what's the deal here, do we mean minimalist equipment, minimalist subject
> matter, minimal manipulation, etc. ?
>
> ...Wayne
>
> Wayne Harridge
>
> http://lrh.structuregraphs.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.16/1841 - Release Date: 12/10/2008
> 9:30 AM
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|