Subject: | Re: [OM] One Roll, One Lens, One Hour |
---|---|
From: | Chris Crawford <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:21:34 -0500 |
As cheap as 50/1.8 lenses are I'd have kept it. I have 3 of them, though one needs work for gummy aperture blades. I don't think I could live with a slow macro as my only 50. -- Chris Crawford Photography & Graphic Design Fort Wayne, Indiana http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work! http://www.plumpatrin.com Something the world NEEDS. On 11/29/08 11:08 PM, "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Congratulations. I'm so tied to post-processing these days that I'm not >> sure I could ever present something straight out of the camera today. >> But I should try. >> > > > Thanks. I'm not sure which was actually scarier: Doing the street > photography or posting the unedited results. There was a huge temptation to > convert them to B&W. But that would have violated a couple rules of this > project. B&W is not a crutch to poor photography. Although a few of those > shots definitely could have been improved had they been B&W. > > As to the lens selection, well, I was going to use the 35/2.8, but decided > to limit myself to a more "common" focal length. Why the macro? Well, > because the 50/1.8 went to live with somebody else. > > Ken -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] One Roll, One Lens, One Hour, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] One Roll, One Lens, One Hour, C.H.Ling |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] One Roll, One Lens, One Hour, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] One Roll, One Lens, One Hour, C.H.Ling |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |