Subject: | Re: [OM] One Roll, One Lens, One Hour |
---|---|
From: | "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:08:03 -0600 |
> > Congratulations. I'm so tied to post-processing these days that I'm not > sure I could ever present something straight out of the camera today. > But I should try. > Thanks. I'm not sure which was actually scarier: Doing the street photography or posting the unedited results. There was a huge temptation to convert them to B&W. But that would have violated a couple rules of this project. B&W is not a crutch to poor photography. Although a few of those shots definitely could have been improved had they been B&W. As to the lens selection, well, I was going to use the 35/2.8, but decided to limit myself to a more "common" focal length. Why the macro? Well, because the 50/1.8 went to live with somebody else. Ken -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] One Roll, One Lens, One Hour, Bob Docherty |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] One Roll, One Lens, One Hour, Chris Crawford |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] One Roll, One Lens, One Hour, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] One Roll, One Lens, One Hour, Chris Crawford |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |