Subject: | Re: [OM] Seat warmer |
---|---|
From: | Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:56:57 -0300 |
Found the plaussible explanation I should be looking for if I were awake _ thanks Chuck. Fernando. Chuck Norcutt wrote: > Cat's pupils vary from round under low illumination to tall vertical > slits under bright illumination. The vertical size under bright light > is about 12mm while human pupils reach a maximum dark adapted size of > 7mm and close down to about 3mm in bright light. Where a typical flash > shot is being taken the human pupil might be 5mm in diameter and the > cat's be 10mm tall or over twice the physical vertical dimension. > That's problem number one. The second problem is that the cat's eyball > is much smaller than a human's so the angle from the vertical edge of > the pupil to the retina is very much larger in the cat than the human. > To eliminate "red eye" in the shot for people or cats you need to have > the flash separated from the lens at a larger angle than that from the > pupil to the retina. > > The solution for shooting flash with the cat is to use much more > separation between flash and lens vertically and also to move the flash > to the side if you can to avoid that vertical slit. I haven't done any > computations here but I suspect strongly that you'll have to get the > flash well off the camera to make it work. > > Dr. Flash > > > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Seat warmer, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] I feel so inferior, C.H.Ling |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Seat warmer, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Seat warmer, Darin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |