Subject: | Re: [OM] An amazing discovery... well, to me anyhow |
---|---|
From: | "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:19:06 -0600 |
I wasn't gloating. Honest! It was tough... One reason why my E-1 has less image-affecting dust is the excessive depth to the filterstack on the front of the sensor. The E-1 sensor (and I presume many of the successors) has rather thick UV and IR filters. This means that any dust that settles on the vibrating membrane in front of the filterstack is actually quite a distance from the sensor surface itslef. Therefore dust bunnies are far enough out of focus to not be an issue. I thought my sensor was clean until I shot at F295. Then I realized just how cruddy it was. My cleaning method is to cut a corner off of a "Swiffer" dust cloth, wrap it around a Q-tip and wipe away. That gets all but one or two specs which then fall right off the next time the camera starts up. I've done this 2-3 times now. The only negative side-effect I've found with the "Swiffer" method is my wife expects me to dust the rest of the house while I'm at it. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] An amazing discovery... well, to me anyhow, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] An amazing discovery... well, to me anyhow, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] An amazing discovery... well, to me anyhow, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] An amazing discovery... well, to me anyhow, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |