Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> For Moose images #19 appears a little undersaturated and #17 even more so.
I intentionally made no color adjustments, as part of the point was to
show how well a scan can come straight out of the scanner using VueScan
and ICC profile.
Nevertheless, I think they are pretty true to the subjects. Neither
plant has bright green foliage, both soft colored, with a bit of
grayishness. Likewise, the flowers seem natural to one who sees them
regularly. They could certainly be enlivened with a bit of saturation
boost. Oddly enough, I very seldom make saturation adjustments. LCE
generally has a similar effect on color brilliance. I need LCE less
often on ICC profile scans than other images, and didn't use it here.
> But that aside they appear to be fine scans.
>
Thanks. The 9950F is not quite up to the FS4000 film scanner in fine
detail, higher nominal resolution or not. And its scans require
more/different sharpening. But for most purposes, it's quite
satisfactory. With the older films I primarily bought it to scan, I
don't suppose there is any difference. From Vincent's reviews of the
two, I can't imagine the V700 won't be comparable.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|