Ah, that makes more sense!
Have you considered an OM-3 - far more easily obtainable, half the price,
all you "lose" is the high-speed flash sync with F280 flashgun, and the
gunmetal powder-coated titanium covers.
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Dawid Loubser
Sent: 22 October 2008 10:51
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Well, I did it...
Hi Piers,
I was maybe not clear enough, the 1/2000 is not for macro, but for shallow
DOF in daylight. It is the "other" thing I really enjoy doing, apart from
Macro.
Your image is very interesting!
regards,
Dawid
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 18:03 +0100, Piers Hemy wrote:
> But if you are thinking of using 1/2000 for macro photography, you are
> going to need some *serious* light levels.
> 3Ti does offer high speed flash synchronisation, but it is at the cost
> of very low guide numbers. I wonder how practical that 1/2000 will be
> for macro. I would stick to OM-1. I did (and it was my 3Ti that sold).
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|