It's a lovely lens, John. I have the older version, bought secondhand
for a pittance, and it is a pleasure to use.
It's quite a large lens and with the 12-60 in a bag it makes for a
heavy combination.
Chris
On 14 Oct 2008, at 14:59, Piers Hemy wrote:
>
> You are asking about the older non-SWD lens, correct, John?
>
> I can't compare it to 12-60, and the comparison of images taken with
> 14-54
> and (even more so) 11-22 seems to be on the verge of comparing
> apples with
> pears, but nevertheless...
>
> The 50-200 in my use is indistinguishable in build quality and imaging
> performance from the 14-54 and 11-22.
>
> --
> Piers
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> Of John Hudson
> Sent: 14 October 2008 13:22
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Olympus ED 50-200mm f2.8/3.5 zoom
>
>
> Does anyone have any comments on the build quality and performance
> of the
> 50-200mm digital zoom?
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|