| Subject: | [OM] Olympus ED 50-200mm f2.8/3.5 zoom |
|---|---|
| From: | John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:22:12 -0300 |
Does anyone have any comments on the build quality and performance of the 50-200mm digital zoom? When measured against the images taken with the 12-60, 14-54 and 11-22 lenses, would the quality of the image from the 50-200 compare less than, equally to or more favourably to those with any one of the three lenses mentioned? John Hudson ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Off topic: Another brush with South African crime, Jan Steinman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Olympus ED 50-200mm f2.8/3.5 zoom, Piers Hemy |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Red-eye avoidance, Jez Cunningham |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Olympus ED 50-200mm f2.8/3.5 zoom, Piers Hemy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |