Subject: | [OM] Re: Single-piece M42 adaptors was Re: IMG: Hummingbird |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:06:59 -0700 |
Jim Nichols wrote: > Wouldn't complain at all if I had the Zuiko 200/4, but the Takumar is paid > for. > As is this Zuiko. What did I use it for recently? Ah, I remember, on an OM-1, sans bag-o-shot, fuzzies even on CF tripod with wetware damping. Not enough ISO/light for hand held. Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: List Status and other stuff, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] 5D MK II, Brent |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Single-piece M42 adaptors was Re: IMG: Hummingbird, Jim Nichols |
Next by Thread: | [OM] 5D MK II, Brent |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |