Wouldn't complain at all if I had the Zuiko 200/4, but the Takumar is paid
for.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:39 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: Single-piece M42 adaptors was Re: IMG: Hummingbird
> Jim Nichols wrote:
>> Andrew,
>>
>> Your comment challenged me to do some crude research. On my scales, I
>> get
>> the following:
>>
>> E-510 Camera Body, 21 ounces
>>
>> Zuiko 14-54 Zoom Lens, 17 ounces
>>
>> Takumar 200mm, f/4 lens, 21 ounces
>>
> Well there's your problem! The Zuiko 200/4 is only 18 ounces.
>
> An old Nikkor-Q Auto 1:4 f=20cm is also 21 ounces.
>
> Moose
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|