Ken Norton wrote:
>
> Very good point. Which begs the question of why the market isn't flooded
> with a huge inventory of unwanted 4000dpi scanners. Since "nobody" shoots
> film anymore, you'd think that they would be as common as Beanie Babies on
> ebay.
>
Likely many are like me, using it less, but with both a big inventory of
older film I intend to scan and still unsure how much film I will be
shooting going forward. I believe I read that film sales have bottomed
out, then bounced back a bit.
With the cost sunk, and the alternatives for scanning unappealing, it
feels good to have the trusty tool at hand.
I happen to have used it quite a bit lately, but would still have it anyway.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|