Subject: | [OM] Re: 70-300mmm was Re: Re: Nath an's PAD 7th August 2008: Berlin se ñ orita |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:06:39 -0700 |
Nathan Wajsman wrote: > ... I like the high maximum aperture of the 50-200mm. But yes, there is a > price to pay in terms of weight, although on the E3 it does not feel too > unbalanced. I have not tried it on my E420 yet ;-) > Tail wags dog. :-) Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: 70-300mmm was Re: Re: Nath an's PAD 7th August 2008: Berlin se ñ orita, Nathan Wajsman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: 70-300mmm was Re: Re: Nath an's PAD 7th August 2008: Berlin se ñ orita, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 70-300mmm was Re: Re: Nath an's PAD 7th August 2008: Berlin se ñ orita, Nathan Wajsman |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: 70-300mmm was Re: Re: Nath an's PAD 7th August 2008: Berlin se � orita, Michael Collins |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |