Yes, but it has been the best bang for the buck, when I was shooting Hawks
last winter/spring. It isn't listed as the mid quality but it appears to be
better then the standard quality lenses.
I'd love to have a 300+ zoom that was mid quality, f2.0 or some such thing
that likly on't happen, or if it does, I won't be able to afford it for
years!
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of swisspace
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 10:36 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: 70-300mmm was Re: Re: Nath an's PAD 7th August 2008:
Berlin se ñ orita
It's funny how people percieve things, they referered to the 70-300 as
the super new lens whereas it was the cheapest of the three.
I let my eldest stepson take some shots - which I think turned out well.
cheers and thanks for looking
Ian
Chris Barker wrote:
> The results look good, Ian. I particularly like the shot of Kerstin,
> of you and Cai in that little cubicle (?) and the plastic, red racing
> car.
>
> And it looks as if you let someone else use your camera and 70-300!
> Can this be true?? :-)
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|